Free Access
Anim. Res.
Volume 53, Number 1, January-February 2004
Page(s) 45 - 57
References of  Anim. Res. 53 (2004) 45-57
  1. Anonymous, The tiered wire floor system for laying hens. Development and testing of an alternative aviary for laying hens (1980-1987), Centre for poultry Research and extension, Beekbergen, Netherlands, 1988.
  2. Abrahamsson P., Furnished cages and aviaries for laying hens, Report No. 234, Uppsala, Sweden, 1996, p. 218.
  3. Abrahamsson P., Tauson R., Aviary systems and conventional cages for laying hens. Effects on production, egg quality, health and bird location in three hybrids, Acta Agric. Scand. A-An. 45 (1995) 191-203.
  4. Abrahamsson P., Tauson R., Effects of group size on performance, health and birds' use of facilities in furnished cages for laying hens, Acta Agric. Scand. A-An. 47 (1997) 254-260.
  5. Abrahamsson P., Tauson R., Performance and egg quality of laying hens in an aviary system, J. Appl. Poult. Res. 7 (1998) 225-232.
  6. Abrahamsson P., Tauson R., Appleby M.C., Behaviour, health and integument of four hybrids of laying hens in modified and conventional cages, Brit. Poult. Sci. 37 (1996) 521-540.
  7. Appleby M.C., Behaviour of laying hens in cages with nest sites, Brit. Poult. Sci. 31 (1990) 71-80.
  8. Appleby M.C., The Edinburgh system for laying hens, Modified cages for laying hens, Proceedings of a symposium held at Nobel House, London, UK, 18 January, 1993.
  9. Appleby M.C., The Edinburgh modified cage: effects of group size and space allowance on brown laying hens, J. Appl. Poult. Res. 7 (1998) 152-161.
  10. Appleby M.C., Modification of laying hen cages to improve behavior, Poult. Sci. 77 (1998) 1828-1832 [PubMed].
  11. Appleby M.C., Hughes B.O., Welfare of laying hens in cages and alternative systems: environmental, physical and behavioural aspects, World Poult. Sci. J. 47 (1991) 109-128.
  12. Appleby M.C., Hughes B.O., The Edinburgh modified cage for laying hens, Brit. Poult. Sci. 36 (1995) 707-718.
  13. Appleby M.C., McRae H.E., The individual nest box as super-stimulus for domestic hens, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 15 (1986) 169-176 [CrossRef].
  14. Appleby M.C., Smith S.F., Hughes B.O., Nesting, dust bathing and perching by laying hens in cages: effects of design on behaviour and welfare, Brit. Poult. Sci. 34 (1993) 835-847.
  15. Appleby M.C., Walker A.W., Nicol C.J., Lindberg A.C., Freire R., Hughes B.O., Elson H.A., Development of furnished cages for laying hens, Brit. Poult. Sci. 43 (2002) 489-500.
  16. Baxter M.R., The welfare problems of laying hens in battery cages, Vet. Rec. 134 (1994) 614-619 [PubMed].
  17. Bessei W., Klinger G., Dust bathing behaviour in domestic fowl, Arch. Geflügelk. 46 (1982) 130-135.
  18. Braastad B.O., Effects on behaviour and plumage of a key-stimuli floor and a perch in triple cages for laying hens, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 27 (1990) 127-139 [CrossRef].
  19. Brantas G.C., Vos-Reesink K.D., Wennrich G., Behavioural observations on hens in multiple compartment cages, each housing 20 hens, Arch. Geflügelk. 42 (1978) 129-132.
  20. Carey J.B., Kuo F.L., Anderson K.E., Effects of cage population on the productive performance of layers, Poult. Sci. 74 (1995) 633-637 [PubMed].
  21. CEC, Council Directive 99/74/EC: laying down minimum standards for protection of laying hens, Official Journal of the European Communities (L 203/53) 19 July, 1999, p. 5.
  22. Dawkins M.S., Cage size and flooring preferences in litter-reared and cage- reared hens, Brit. Poult. Sci. 24 (1983) 177-182.
  23. Duncan E.T., Appleby M.C., Hughes B.O., Effect of perches in laying cages on welfare and production of hens, Brit. Poult. Sci. 33 (1992) 25-35.
  24. Duncan I.J., Behavior and behavioral needs, Poult. Sci. 77 (1998) 1766-1772 [PubMed].
  25. Engström B., Schaller G., Experimental studies of the health of laying hens in relation to housing system, in: Savoroy C.J., Hughes B.O. (Eds.), Proceedings of the IV European Symposium on Poultry Welfare, Edinburgh, 1993, pp. 87-96.
  26. Fiks-van Niekerk G.C.M., Reuvekamp B.F.J., Emous R.A., Furnished cages for larger groups of laying hens, in: Oester H., Wyss C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the VI European Symposium on Poultry Welfare, Zollikofen (SWI), 2001, pp. 20-22.
  27. Fleming R.H., Whitehead C.C., Alvey D., Gregory N.G., Wilkins L.J., Bone structure and breaking strength in laying hens housed in different husbandry systems, Brit. Poult. Sci. 35 (1994) 651-662.
  28. Hilbrich P., History of poultry health, Arch. Geflügelk. 50 (1986) 115-117.
  29. Hughes B.O., Choice between artificial turf and wire floor as nest sites in individually caged laying hens, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 36 (1993) 327-335 [CrossRef].
  30. Ketelaere B.D., Govaerts T., Coucke P., Dewil E., Visscher J., Decuypere E., Baerdemaeker J.D., Measuring the egg shell strength of 6 different genetic strains of laying hens: techniques and comparisons, Brit. Poult. Sci. 43 (2002) 238-244.
  31. Kuit A.R., Ehlhardt D.A., Blokuis H.J., Alternative improved housing systems for poultry, Commission of the European Communities, Beekbergen (NLD), 1989, 163 p.
  32. Michel V., Huonnic D., Protais J., Cotte J.P., Comparaison du bien-être, de l'état de sanitaire et des performances zootechniques de poules pondeuses, élevées dans un système classique de cages ou dans un système alternattif de type "volière" : résultats préliminaires, in: WPSA (Eds.), Proceedings of the "5$^{\rm es}$ Journées de la Recherche Avicole", Tours (FRA), 2003, pp. 69-76.
  33. Moinard C., Morisse J.P., Faure J.M., Effect of cage area, cage height and perches on feather condition, bone breakage and mortality of laying hens, Brit. Poult. Sci. 39 (1998) 198-202.
  34. Nicol C.J., Effect of cage height and area on the behaviour of hens housed in battery cages, Brit. Poult. Sci. 28 (1987) 327-335.
  35. Nicol C.J., Behavioural responses of laying hens following a period of spatial restriction, Anim. Behav. 35 (1987) 1709-1719.
  36. Petherick J.C., Duncan I.J.H., Behaviour of young domestic fowl directed towards different substrates, Brit. Poult. Sci. 30 (1989) 229-238.
  37. Smith S.F., Appleby M.C., Hughes B.O., Problem solving by domestic hens: opening doors to reach nest sites, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 28 (1990) 287-292 [CrossRef].
  38. Smith S.F., Appleby M.C., Hughes B.O., Nesting and dust bathing by hens in cages: matching and mis-matching between behaviour and environment, Brit. Poult. Sci. 34 (1993) 21-33.
  39. Snedecor G.W., Cochran W.G., Statistical Methods, University Press, Ames, IA, Iowa State, 1989.
  40. Tanaka T., Hurnik J.F., Comparison of behavior and performance of laying hens housed in battery cages and an aviary, Poult. Sci. 71 (1992) 235-243 [PubMed].
  41. Tauson R., The state of development and experiences of new furnished cages for laying hens, Arch. Geflugelk. 63 (1999) 189-193.
  42. Tauson R., Furnished cages and aviaries: production and health, World Poult. Sci. J. 58 (2002) 49-58.
  43. Tauson R., Experiences of production and welfare in small group cages in Sweden, in: WPSA (Eds.), Proceedings of the XVI European Symposium on the Quality of Poultry Meat and European Symposium on the Quality of Eggs and Egg Production, ISPAIA Ploufragan (FRA), 2003, pp. 217-229.
  44. Tauson R., Wahlstrom A., Abrahamsson P., Effect of two floor housing systems and cages on health, production, and fear response in layers, J. Appl. Poult. Res. 8 (1999) 152-159.