EDP Sciences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 53 / No 5 (September-October 2004) Anim. Res., 53 5 (2004) 419-428 References
Free Access
Issue
Anim. Res.
Volume 53, Number 5, September-October 2004
Modelling of herd functioning in France and in tropical areas.
Page(s) 419 - 428
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:2004028
References of Anim. Res. 53 419-428
  1. Atlan H., Entre le cristal et la fumée - Essai sur l'organisation du vivant, Paris, Seuil, 1979.
  2. Bailey D.W., Daily selection of feeding areas by cattle in homogeneous and heterogeneous environments, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 45 (1995) 183-200 [CrossRef].
  3. Bailey D.W., Gross J.E., Laca E.A., Rittenhouse L.R., Coughenour M.B., Swift D.M., Sims P.L., Mechanisms that result in large herbivore grazing distribution patterns, J. Range Manage. 49 (1996) 386-400.
  4. Ballot G., Weisbuch G., Application of Simulation to Social Sciences, Hermes, 2000.
  5. Baumont R., Dumont B., Carrère P., Pérochon L., Mazel C., Design of a multi-agent model of a herd of ruminants grazing a perennial grassland: the animal sub-model, in: Durand J.L. et al. (Eds.), Multi-function Grasslands - Quality Forages, Animal Products and Landscapes, EGF, Grassland Sci. Europe 7 (2002) 236-237.
  6. Baumont R., Cohen-Salmon D., Prache S., Sauvant D., A mechanistic model of intake and grazing behaviour in sheep integrating sward architecture and animal decisions, Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 112 (2004) 5-28 [CrossRef].
  7. Beecham J.A., Farnsworth K.D., Animal foraging from an individual perspective: an object orientated model, Ecol. Model. 113 (1998) 141-156 [CrossRef].
  8. Benhamou S., Spatial memory and searching efficiency, Anim. Behav. 47 (1994) 1423-1433 [CrossRef].
  9. Boissy A., Dumont B., Interactions between social and feeding motivations on the grazing behaviour of herbivores: sheep more easily split into subgroups with familiar peers, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 79 (2002) 233-245 [CrossRef].
  10. Campos A., Hill D.R.C., An agent-based framework for visual-interactive ecosystem simulation, SCS Trans. 15 (1998) 139-152.
  11. Cantrell R.S., Cosner C., Models for predator-prey systems at multiple scales, Siam Rev. 38 (1996) 256-286 [MathSciNet].
  12. Cellier F.E., Continuous System Modelling, Springer Verlag, 1991.
  13. Coquillard P., Hill D.R.C., Modélisation et simulation d'écosystèmes - Des modèles déterministes aux simulations à événements discrets, Masson, Paris, 1997.
  14. De Angelis D., Gross L.J., Individual-based models and approaches in ecology: populations, communities and ecosystems, Chapman and Hall, New York, 1992.
  15. Deffuant G., Huet S., Bousset J.P., Henriot J., Amon G., Weisbuch G., Agent based simulation of organic farming conversion in Allier departement, in: Janssen M.A. (Ed.), Complexity and Ecosystem Management, Edward Elgar Publishers, 2002, pp. 158-189.
  16. Doram J., From computer simulation to artificial societies, SCS Trans. 14 (1997) 69-77.
  17. Drogoul A., Corbara B., Lalande S., MANTA: New Experimental Results on the Emergence of (Artificial) Ant Societies, in: Gilbert N., Conte R. (Eds.), Artificial Societies: the computer simulation of social life, UCL Press, 1995, pp. 190-211.
  18. Dumont B., Hill D.R.C., Multi-agent simulation of group foraging in sheep: effects of spatial memory, conspecific attraction and plot size, Ecol. Model. 141 (2001) 201-215 [CrossRef].
  19. Dumont B., Petit M., Spatial memory of sheep at pasture, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 60 (1998) 43-53 [CrossRef].
  20. Dumont B., Dutronc A., Petit M., How readily will sheep walk for a preferred forage? J. Anim. Sci. 76 (1998) 965-971 [PubMed].
  21. Etienne M., Le Page C., Cohen M., A step-by-step approach to building land management scenarios based on multiple viewpoints on multi-agent system simulations, J. Artif. Soc. Social Simul. 6 (2003), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/2/2.html.
  22. Farnsworth K.D., Beecham J.A., How do grazers achieve their distribution? A continuum of models from Random Diffusion to the Ideal Free Distribution using biased random walks, Am. Nat. 153 (1999) 509-526 [CrossRef].
  23. Ferber J., Multi-Agent Systems: Introduction to Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Addison Wesley, 1999.
  24. Fortin D., Optimal searching behaviour: the value of sampling information, Ecol. Model. 153 (2002) 279-290 [CrossRef].
  25. Grand S., Cliff D., Malhotra A., Creatures: Artificial Life Autonomous Software Agents for Home Entertainment, in: Autonomous Agents'97, Marina del Rey, CA,1997.
  26. Grimm V., Ten years of individual-based modelling in ecology: what have we learned and what could we learn in the future? Ecol. Model. 115 (1999) 129-148 [CrossRef].
  27. Gross J.E., Zank C., Hobbs N.T., Spalinger D.E., Movement rules for herbivores in spatially heterogeneous environments: responses to small scale patterns, Landsc. Ecol. 10 (1995) 209-217 [CrossRef].
  28. Hill D.R.C., Object-Oriented Analysis and Simulation, Addison-Wesley, 1996.
  29. Hill D.R.C., Mechoud S., Campos A., Coquillard P., Gueugnot J., Orth D., Michelin Y., Poix C., L'Homme G., Carrère P., Lafarge M., Loiseau P., Micol D., Brun J.P., Decuq F., Dumont B., Petit M., Teuma M., Modélisation de l'entretien du paysage par des herbivores en moyenne montagne : une approche multi-agents, Ingénieries-EAT 21 (2000) 63-75.
  30. Hirvonen H., Ranta E., Rita H., Peuhkuri N., Significance of memory properties in prey choice decisions, Ecol. Model. 115 (1999) 177-189 [CrossRef].
  31. Huston M., De Angelis D., Pott W., New computer models unify ecological theory, BioScience 38 (1988) 682-691.
  32. Inglis I.R., Langton S., Forkman B., Lazarus J., An information primacy model of exploratory and foraging behaviour, Anim. Behav. 62 (2001) 543-577 [CrossRef].
  33. Le Moigne J.L., La Théorie du Système Général : Théorie de la Modélisation. Système Décision, PUF, 1977.
  34. Le Moigne J.L., La Modélisation des Systèmes Complexes, Dunod, Paris, 1990.
  35. Mathieu P., Müller J.P., Systèmes multi-agents et systèmes complexes : Ingénierie Résolution de problèmes et simulation, Hermes Lavoisier, 2002.
  36. Odell J., Objects and agents compared, J. Obj. Technol. 1 (2002) 41-53.
  37. O'Hare G.M.P., Jennings N.R., Foundations of Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Wiley and Sons, New-York, 1996.
  38. Oom S.P., Hester A.J., Elston D.A., Legg C.J., Spatial interaction models: from human geography to plant-herbivore interactions, Oikos 98 (2002) 65-74 [CrossRef].
  39. Pedersen E.K., Connelly J.W., Hendrickson J.R., Grant W.E., Effect of sheep grazing and fire on sage grouse populations in southeastern Idaho, Ecol. Model. 165 (2003) 23-47 [CrossRef].
  40. Roese J.H., Rittenhouse K.L., Folse L.J., Habitat heterogeneity and foraging efficiency: an individual-based model, Ecol. Model. 57 (1991) 133-143 [CrossRef].
  41. Roguet C., Prache S., Petit M., Feeding station behaviour of ewes in response to forage availability and sward phenological stage, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 56 (1998) 187-201 [CrossRef].
  42. Shiyomi M., Tsuiki M., Model for the spatial pattern formed by a small herd in grazing cattle, Ecol. Model. 119 (1999) 231-238 [CrossRef].
  43. Stephens D.W., Krebs J.R., Foraging Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1986.
  44. Toquenaga Y., Kajitani I., Hoshino T., Egrets of a feather flock together, in: Brooks R.A., Maes P. (Eds.), Artificial Life IV, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1994, pp. 140-151.
  45. Tu X., Terzopoulos D., Artificial Fishes: Physics, Locomotion, Perception and Behavior, in Proc. SIGGRAPH'94, ACM Press, Orlando Florida, 1994, pp. 43-50.
  46. Turner M.G., Wu Y., Romme W.H., Wallace L.L., A landscape simulation model of winter foraging by large ungulates, Ecol. Model. 69 (1993) 163-184 [CrossRef].
  47. Von Bertalanffy L., Théorie Générale des Systèmes, Dunod, Paris, 1987.
  48. Wallis de Vries M.F., Effects of resource distribution patterns on ungulate foraging behaviour: a modelling approach, For. Ecol. Manage. 88 (1996) 167-177.