The relationship between farmers' attitude and behaviour towards calves, and productivity of veal units
Ann. Zootech., 49 4 (2000) 313-327
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Implementation of management recommendations in unweaned dairy calves in western Germany and associated challenges
Jason J. Hayer, Dorit Nysar, Céline Heinemann, Caroline D. Leubner and Julia Steinhoff-WagnerJournal of Dairy Science (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-19829
Costs and Benefits of Improving Farm Animal Welfare
Jill N. Fernandes, Paul H. Hemsworth, Grahame J. Coleman and Alan J. TilbrookAgriculture 11 (2) 104 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11020104
Farmers’ representations of the effects of precision livestock farming on human-animal relationships
Florence Kling-Eveillard, Clément Allain, Xavier Boivin, Valérie Courboulay, Pauline Créach, Aurore Philibert, Yannick Ramonet and Nathalie HostiouLivestock Science 238 104057 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104057
Calf- and herd-level factors associated with dairy calf reactivity
J. Calderón-Amor, A. Beaver, M.A.G. von Keyserlingk and C. GalloJournal of Dairy Science 103 (5) 4606 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-16878
Zookeepers’ Perception of Zoo Canid Welfare and its Effect on Job Satisfaction, Worldwide
Giacomo Riggio, Federica Pirrone, Elia Lunghini, Angelo Gazzano and Chiara MaritiAnimals 10 (5) 916 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10050916
Alpaca and llama behaviour during handling and its associations with caretaker attitudes and human-animal contact
Ines Windschnurer, Cassandra Eibl, Sonja Franz, Elisabeth M. Gilhofer and Susanne WaiblingerApplied Animal Behaviour Science 226 104989 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2020.104989
Which Factors Influence Farmers’ Use of Protective Measures During Pesticides Exposure?
Maryam Afshari, Jalal Poorolajal, Forouzan Rezapur-Shahkolai, Mohammad Javad Assari and Akram Karimi-ShahanjariniWorkplace Health & Safety 67 (7) 338 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1177/2165079919827042
Good keeper-elephant relationships in North American zoos are mutually beneficial to welfare
Kathy Carlstead, Stephen Paris and Janine L. BrownApplied Animal Behaviour Science 211 103 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2018.11.003
Why Should Human-Animal Interactions Be Included in Research of Working Equids’ Welfare?
Daniela Luna and Tamara TadichAnimals 9 (2) 42 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9020042
71 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100938-3.00004-8
The Effect of Extensive Human Presence at an Early Age on Stress Responses and Reactivity of Juvenile Ostriches towards Humans
Pfunzo Muvhali, Maud Bonato, Anel Engelbrecht, Irek Malecki, Denise Hough, Jane Robinson, Neil Evans and Schalk CloeteAnimals 8 (10) 175 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8100175
Human and farm influences on dairy cows´ responsiveness towards humans – a cross-sectional study
Asja Ebinghaus, Silvia Ivemeyer, Ute Knierim and Juan J. LoorPLOS ONE 13 (12) e0209817 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209817
Caretaker attitudes toward swine euthanasia1
Magnus R Campler, Monique D Pairis-Garcia, Jean-Loup Rault, Grahame Coleman and Andreia G ArrudaTranslational Animal Science 2 (3) 254 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txy015
Livestock drivers' knowledge about dairy cow fitness for transport – A Danish questionnaire survey
M.S. Herskin, A. Hels, I. Anneberg and P.T. ThomsenResearch in Veterinary Science 113 62 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.09.008
Influences on the avoidance and approach behaviour of dairy goats towards an unfamiliar human—An on-farm study
Dorit Mersmann, Claudia Schmied-Wagner, Eva Nordmann, Christine Graml and Susanne WaiblingerApplied Animal Behaviour Science 179 60 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2016.02.009
Validity and feasibility of Human-Animal Relationship tests for on-farm welfare assessment in dairy goats
Monica Battini, Sara Barbieri, Susanne Waiblinger and Silvana MattielloApplied Animal Behaviour Science 178 32 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2016.03.012
INVITED REVIEW: Farm size and animal welfare1
J. A. Robbins, M. A. G. von Keyserlingk, D. Fraser and D. M. WearyJournal of Animal Science 94 (12) 5439 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016-0805
A prospective exploration of farm, farmer, and animal characteristics in human-animal relationships: An epidemiological survey
Alice de Boyer des Roches, Isabelle Veissier, Xavier Boivin, Emmanuelle Gilot-Fromont and Luc MounierJournal of Dairy Science 99 (7) 5573 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10633
The influence of gentle interactions on avoidance distance towards humans, weight gain and physiological parameters in group-housed dairy calves
Stephanie Lürzel, Charlotte Münsch, Ines Windschnurer, et al.Applied Animal Behaviour Science 172 9 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2015.09.004
Attitudes of farmers towards cattle dehorning
F. Kling-Eveillard, U. Knierim, N. Irrgang, et al.Livestock Science 179 12 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.05.012
Prevalence and potential influencing factors of non-nutritive oral behaviors of veal calves on commercial farms
H. Leruste, M. Brscic, G. Cozzi, et al.Journal of Dairy Science 97 (11) 7021 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-7917
Welfare quality applied to the Brazilian dairy cattle
G.A. Franchi, P.R. Garcia and I.J.O. SilvaJournal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology 2 (2) 60 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.14269/2318-1265.v02n02a04
Using qualitative behaviour assessment to explore the link between stockperson behaviour and dairy calf behaviour
Kristian Ellingsen, Grahame J. Coleman, Vonne Lund and Cecilie M. MejdellApplied Animal Behaviour Science 153 10 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2014.01.011
Approach behaviour of shelter dogs and its relationships with the attitudes of shelter staff to dogs
Christine Arhant and Josef TroxlerApplied Animal Behaviour Science 160 116 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2014.08.013
Cattle producers’ perceptions of biosecurity
Marnie L Brennan and Robert M ChristleyBMC Veterinary Research 9 (1) 71 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-9-71
Attitudes of Dairy Farmers toward Cow Welfare in Relation to Housing, Management and Productivity
Tiina Kauppinen, Anna Valros and Kari Mikko VesalaAnthrozoös 26 (3) 405 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.2752/175303713X13697429463718
2011 AND 2012 EARLY CAREERS ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS: Farm and pig factors affecting welfare during the marketing process1,2
A. K. Johnson, L. M. Gesing, M. Ellis, J. J. McGlone, E. Berg, S. M. Lonergan, R. Fitzgerald, L. A. Karriker, A. Ramirez, K. J. Stalder, A. Sapkota, R. Kephart, J. T. Selsby, L. J. Sadler and M. J. RitterJournal of Animal Science 91 (6) 2481 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-6114
Farmer attitude toward improvement of animal welfare is correlated with piglet production parameters
Tiina Kauppinen, Kari Mikko Vesala and Anna ValrosLivestock Science 143 (2-3) 142 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.09.011
Evaluation of on-farm veal calves’ responses to unfamiliar humans and potential influencing factors
H. Leruste, E. A. M. Bokkers, L. F. M. Heutinck, et al.animal 6 (12) 2003 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112001346
11 111 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19297-5_6
Reliability of an avoidance distance test for the assessment of animals’ responsiveness to humans and a preliminary investigation of its association with farmers’ attitudes on bull fattening farms
Ines Windschnurer, Xavier Boivin and Susanne WaiblingerApplied Animal Behaviour Science 117 (3-4) 117 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.12.013
Danish dairy farmers’ perceptions and attitudes related to calf-management in situations of high versus no calf mortality
Mette Vaarst and Jan Tind SørensenPreventive Veterinary Medicine 89 (1-2) 128 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.02.015
7 211 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8909-1_7
Positive attitudes of farmers and pen-group conservation reduce adverse reactions of bulls during transfer for slaughter
L. Mounier, S. Colson, M. Roux, et al.animal 2 (06) (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731108001948
Assessing the human–animal relationship in farmed species: A critical review
Susanne Waiblinger, Xavier Boivin, Vivi Pedersen, et al.Applied Animal Behaviour Science 101 (3-4) 185 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.02.001
Links between specialization in the finishing of bulls, mixing, farmers' attitudes towards animals and the production of finishing bulls: a survey on French farms
L. Mounier, S. Colson, M. Roux, et al.Animal Science 82 (04) (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1079/ASC200652
Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) on a request from the Commission related with the risks of poor welfare in intensive calf farming systems
EFSA Journal 4 (6) 366 (2006)https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2006.366
The relationship between beliefs, attitudes and observed behaviours of abattoir personnel in the pig industry
G.J. Coleman, M. McGregor, P.H. Hemsworth, J. Boyce and S. DowlingApplied Animal Behaviour Science 82 (3) 189 (2003)
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00057-1
Human–cattle interactions in group housing
Satu RaussiApplied Animal Behaviour Science 80 (3) 245 (2003)
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00213-7
The farmers’ influence on calves’ behaviour, health and production of a veal unit
B. J. Lensink, I. Veissier and L. FlorandAnimal Science 72 (01) 105 (2001)
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800055600