Free Access
Issue
Anim. Res.
Volume 54, Number 4, July-August 2005
Page(s) 259 - 267
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:2005025
References of Anim. Res. 54 259-267
  1. Anon, Council Directive 92/46/EEC, Official J. European Communities No. L268/2, 1992, pp. 1-32.
  2. De Koning C.J.A.M., Ipema A.H., Milking characteristics of two liners, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Robotic Milking, Lelystad, Netherlands, 17th-19th August, 2000, pp. 58-59.
  3. Genstat, 5 Release 3.2., Lawes Agricultural Trust, Rothamsed Experimental Station, 1995.
  4. Gleeson D.E., O'Callaghan E., Effect of liner design and plant vacuum level on bovine teat-tissue reaction, Irish J. Agric. Food Res. 37 (1998) 135.
  5. Gleeson D.E., O'Callaghan E., Effect of two milking principles on the milking characteristics of dairy cows, Irish J. Agric. Food Res. 39 (2000) 482.
  6. Gleeson D.E., O'Callaghan E., Effect of system vacuum level on bovine teat-tissue reaction and milking characteristics, Proceedings, Annual Meeting of National Mastitis Council, Inc. Arlington, Virginia, 14th-17th February, 1999, Vol. 38, pp. 209- 210.
  7. Gleeson E., O'Callaghan E.J., Rath M., Effect of milking on bovine teat tissue as measured by ultrasonography, Irish Vet. J. 55 (2002) 1000-1004.
  8. Gleeson D.E., O'Callaghan E., Rath M., The effects of genotype, milking time and teat-end vacuum pattern on the prevalence and severity of teat-end hyperkeratosis, Irish J. Agric. Food Res. 42 (2003) 195-203.
  9. Hamann J., Physio-pathological aspects of machine milking, Proceedings of the International Symposium of Bovine Mastitis, Milan, 1992, pp. 53-67.
  10. Hamann J., Mein G.A., Wetzel S., Teat tissue reactions to milking. Effects of vacuum level, J. Dairy Sci. (1993) 1040-1056.
  11. Hamann J., Machine induced teat Tissue Changes and New Infection Risk, Proceedings of International Conference on Machine Milking and Mastitis, Silver Springs Hotel, Cork, 23rd May 1997, pp. 89-109.
  12. Hillerton J.E., Ohnstad I., Bainnes J., Relationship of cluster performance to postmilking teat condition, Proceedings of Annual Meeting, National Mastitis Conference, St Louis, 1998, Vol. 37, pp. 75-84.
  13. Hillerton J.E., Ohnstad I., Bainnes J., Leach K.A., Changes in cow teat tissue created by two types of milking cluster, J. Dairy Res. 67 (2000) 309-317 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  14. Hillerton J.E., Pankey J.W., Pankey P., Effect of over-milking on teat condition, J. Dairy Res. 69 (2002) 81-84 [CrossRef] [PubMed].
  15. International Dairy Federation, in: Bulletin, Laboratory methods for use in mastitis work, International Dairy Federation, Brussels, 1981, pp. 1-7.
  16. International Dairy Federation, in: Bulletin, Recommendations for presentation of mastitis-related data. Part 2: Clinical mastitis, International Dairy Federation, Brussels, 1997, p. 321.
  17. ISO 3918, Milking machine installations-Vocabulary, International Organization for Standards, Geneva, Switzerland, 1996, 39 p.
  18. Lewis S., Cockcroft P.D., Bramley R.A., Jackson P.G., The likelihood of sub-clinical mastitis in quarters with different types of teat lesions in the dairy cow, Cattle Practice 8 (2002) 293-299.
  19. Mein G.A., (Teat club international, I.D.F), Evaluation of Bovine Teat Condition in Commercial Dairy Herds: Non-infectious Factors, Proceedings of 2nd International Symposium on Mastitis and Milk Quality, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 13th-15th September, 2001, pp. 347-351.
  20. Neijenhuis F., (Teat club international, I.D.F), Evaluation of Bovine Teat Condition in Commercial Dairy Herds: Relationship between Teat-End Callosity or Hyperkeratosis and Mastitis, Proceedings of 2nd International Symposium on Mastitis and Milk Quality, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 13th-15th September, 2001, pp. 362-366.
  21. O'Callaghan E.J., Gleeson D.E., Measurement of vacuum stability in milking units during simulated milking, Irish J. Agric. Food Res. 38 (1999) 272.
  22. O'Callaghan E.J., Gleeson D.E., Evaluation of milking systems in terms of new mastitis risk, teat tissue reactions and milking performance, End of project report. 4505, Teagasc, November, 2000, 16 p.
  23. O'Callaghan E., Measurement of liner slips, milking times and milk yield, J. Dairy Sci. 79 (1996) 390-395 [PubMed].
  24. O'Callaghan E., Measurement of vacuum in the cluster, using a milkflow simulator, Irish J. Agric. Food Res. 37 (1998) 137.
  25. O'Shea J., O'Callaghan E., Experiments on milking machine components at Moorepark 1978-1980, An Foras Taluntais, Dublin, Ireland, 1982, pp. 200-211 (ISBN 0-905442-68-7).
  26. Rasmussen M.D., Madsen N.P., Effects of Milkline Vacuum, Pulsator Airline Vacuum and Cluster Weight on Milk Yield, Teat Condition, and Udder Health, J. Dairy Sci. 83 (2000) 77-84 [PubMed].
  27. Spencer S.B., Griel L.C., Goldberg J.J., The use of Ultrasonography to measure teat congestion, Proceedings of National Mastitis Council Meeting, 1996, Vol. 35, pp. 172-173.
  28. Zecconi A., Hamann J., Bronzo V., Ruffo G., Machine-induced teat tissue reactions and infection risk in a dairy herd free of contagious mastitis pathogens, J. Dairy Res. 59 (1992) 265-271 [PubMed].